DEFENDING OUR SOVEREIGNTY

Thursday, March 29, 2012

Federal Budget 2012 - The Battle Lines Have Been Drawn

The Conservative budget was released today with most mainstream political commentators wiping their brows, saying "Phewf, we thought it would be much worse!" People like Kevin O'Leary were asking why the Conservative government didn't go further to open up Canada for international investment. Others were relieved that only 19,200 federal public service jobs would be lost as opposed to the 60,000 that were predicted. Still others were wondering what the streamlined environmental review processes might mean.

http://www.budget.gc.ca/2012/plan/toc-tdm-eng.html

The area with which I am most concerned relates to what was and was not in the budget for Indigenous Peoples. I am not surprised by this budget, in fact, it is just about exactly what I predicted it would be. What I am surprised about is how the Assembly of First Nations' National Chief Shawn Atleo could possibly think this was a good budget.

http://www.afn.ca/index.php/en/news-media/latest-news/afn-national-chief-responds-to-federal-budget-calls-for-continued-work

Atleo says: "The investments in education in today's budget indicate that the voices of our youth are perhaps beginning to be heard...". Well, let's look what was and was not provided for First Nation education:

For elementary and secondary education (k-12), approximately $1.5B in extra funding is needed this year to have an education system almost on par with the provinces. This budget only provided $100M for this year, most of which will go to early literacy (and not in our languages).

For post-secondary education (PSE), we have an estimated need of half a billion dollars for this year as we have no less than 10,000 First Nation students on a waiting list to go to university. This budget appears to provide $0 for PSE.

Atleo says that "First Nations will seize this momentum to move forward to real reform and reconciliation". What momentum? According to the documents the AFN provided, over $6.7B is required this year to properly fund k-12 education and address the cumulative shortfall. The Cons provided only 4% of what is actually needed. I fail to see how this is momentum. The current cap on funding is at 2% - this is but a fraction more.

Let's put these numbers into proper perspective. INAC estimates that it will add approximately 45,000 people as status Indians as a result of the Bill C-3 amendment to the Indian Act. It has also estimated that upwards of 50,000 new status Indians will be added because of the new Qalipu band. This is a total of 95,000 new status Indians to be added to the 704,851 INAC's website claims are currently registered. This is an increase in the registered population of approximately 14% through registration alone. Offering an additional 4% of what is actually needed for the current population for education is an insult, but considering the new population, it is no increase at all.

Given that education is a treaty right, this amounts to an overt violation of First Nations treaties and very clear signal that there will be no future of increased, flexible, permanent funding set aside for First Nations education. The fact that no money was set aside for an increase in PSE is a further sign of things to come. The Cons have drawn their line in the sand and NC Atleo continues as if oblivious to the impending battle.

I don't see any "real reform and reconciliation" in a budget that offers $330M for water infrastructure over 2 years when the actual need is $6.578B. This amounts to approximately 5% of what is actually needed. If it cost your family $20,000 to install plumbing in your house to run water and have proper sanitation, what good would $1,000 do if you didn't have the other $19,000? What kind of reform is that? Again, the Conservatives are laughing in the face of the current crisis of poverty in First Nations while NC Atleo praises them for "real reconciliation".

This year the whole world saw first hand what the crisis in First Nation housing looks like. The pictures from Attawapiskat First Nation showed people living in unheated sheds with no running water. The media frenzy which followed shamed Harper into having a Crown-First Nation Gathering that had been promised several times over his years in office, but which never came to fruition. It was Attawapiskat that brought about that "historic" meeting and not NC Atleo, despite claims otherwise.

Yet, not a single cent was dedicated to address the crisis in First Nation housing. What about this lack of funding for housing speaks of reconciliation? The assimilation scheme of starving the Indians off the reserve is well entrenched in Conservative policy, yet Atleo sees this budget as making "important investments".

I can assure you that I am not seeing monsters where non exist. This assimilation plan for Indians is well-documented in government records and has always been considered by INAC as "the final solution". The Cons are just more aggressive in speeding assimilation along. The budget document focuses on "integration" of Aboriginal peoples into Canadian society - as a labour source, as tax payers and as individual property owners. Even the constitutionally protected right of Indigenous peoples to be specifically consulted and accommodated on their Aboriginal and treaty rights is translated as consultation (no accommodation) that will be "integrated" into current regulatory processes.

But let's look at what is really happening. The Indian Act is staying in place, as confirmed at the CFNG and the current level of federal control over First Nations will not only be maintained, but will be dramatically increased with the suite of legislation it intends to impose on First Nations. This budget confirmed what we already heard in the CFNG:

(1) Non-Indians will gain interests in reserve lands in the matrimonial real property legislation;

(2) Cons will transfer all liability for water and sewer on reserve to First Nations without funding to address the increased standards;

(3) First Nation education legislation will impose increased standards and force provincial partnerships while not providing additional funds;

(4) Reserves will be opened up to privatization (ownership by individuals) to allow mass sales of reserve lands and facilitate extractive industry activities on our lands; and

(5) Accountability legislation to impose standards on First Nations leaders not imposed on Members of Parliament.

Again, I am really confused how any of this screams "reconciliation". In fact, this entire suite of legislation violates our inherent rights to be self-determining and violates our constitutionally protected  Aboriginal and treaty rights to govern our own affairs. It also threatens our communally-held traditional lands and current reserve land holdings. It will result in a dumping of liability and no funding to cope with a whole slew of additional regulations and standards that Canada itself can't meet in First Nations now.

In fairness, Atleo did say "First Nations must be at the table on any discussions that could affects our lands, our lives and our rights". Or what? What is Atleo going to do? He certainly has represented ANY kind of threat to the Cons yet, nor has he publicly offered any real resistance to this run-away assimilation train. He also states that he will get clarity of what all this legislation means and ensure First Nations voices are "respected". Really? Our voices have not been during his whole tenure - what makes now any different, except maybe that his election is coming up in July?

The fact is, the AFN knows full well what these proposed pieces of legislation mean as they have already testified before the House and Senate on some of them. The focus should not be in ensuring our voice is "respected", it should be in ensuring that our inherent right to be self-determining is respected, implemented and enforced. Our jurisdiction over our own communities is what needs to be recognized. We don't need 5 more Indian Acts to prescribe how we will live our lives. I don't want my voice to be accommodated in federal legislation - I don't want the federal legislation.

I honestly wish I could find some positive in what NC Atleo is doing on all our behalves, but I just can't. It is not a personal thing, as I don't know him as a person - most of us don't and never will. I don't get to vote in AFN elections, so this is not about voting. I have given the issue a great deal of thought and have spoken to a great many people that I trust about my dilemma in criticizing an organization that is set up to advocate on our behalf. It hurts me to do it, but after much contemplation and soul-searching, I feel like I have no choice.

All we, as grassroots people, have to go by is what Atleo does or does not accomplish for us. The proof is in the outcome and this is not the outcome that will move our Nations forward in decolonizing, healing, rebuilding our languages and cultures and protecting our traditional territories for future generations. While Atleo cannot be blamed for the aggressive assimilation plan of the Cons (and I admit, he has a tough political landscape right now), he is to blame if he does not stand up and actively resist it.

Our people are the ones who live in shacks - now is not the time to tell them their voices are "being heard". Our people are dying pre-mature deaths - now is not the time to promote "reconciliation". Our people see the impending battle - now is not the time to "seek clarity". Our people need a leader - now is not the time to be a politician.

9 comments:

  1. Pam, perhaps you are that leader

    ReplyDelete
  2. An elder from my reserve in an community education strategy meeting asked "what is a blue ribbon panel?" Her neice answered "it's like the best cow award at the fair". We all laughed. These ladies, my distant relatives, could not have been more correct. Blue Ribbon Education Panel resulted "investment" has been made a joke! 4% increase, is that all our native children are worth? Why is my daughter less deserving than any other child? She already goes to a language immersion program which is underfunded by 80%. And the other half of her day still cannot be considered equal resource funding with a provincial school. Way to go Harper, you asked to be heard out with this education panel. We obliged. I will not be dettered by fluff communications. You better bet it's on! Parliament is on our unceded lands and you can't throw us an extra 10 million to even the score for education? C'mon Harper, I know your people read this. You're making it harder for yourself and your government. I see how it is.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Thank you...I was beginning to think I was the only one who saw this budget as an absolute propoganda churning media farce.

    ReplyDelete
  4. ...and is all this 'new' money, or part of the 2% or whatever amount they were already going to provide? If it included already allocated funds, this would be even more piddly than what you described. How could anyone justify this as progress when its so obvious we are going downhill. Great article Pam.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Thanks everyone for your comments and support. This budget is only what we can see - it does not illuminate the actual shell game of monies taken from one program to pay another, or how they make monies look like an increase, but are really a decrease. They also don't show how access to the funds change, i.e. going from core funding to project-based for example.

    Canada is in OUR house and it is time we reminded them who has the REAL sovereignty here.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Brava Pam!

    I saw this posted at Rabble's forum, Babble, and at the Bread and Roses forum. I have shared it on Facebook.

    ReplyDelete
  7. "The assimilation scheme of starving the Indians off the reserve is well entrenched in Conservative policy"

    I've been working on a private report to the Chief Medical Officer of B.C. on poverty and homelessness issues. Writing about the 'poverty industry' and the nutritionally poor food in food banks, I cited frequent comments I have heard from poor people who think the government just wants them to die off. When I actually wrote that down, it sounded too conspiratorial, so I did a quick internet search and discovered an interesting website about food and the forced assimilation of the Inuit. see: http://caid.ca/nut_north.html

    Here's an excerpt from that website:

    In 2009, under the Access to Information Act, CAID obtained a 2002 study commissioned by INAC that recommended the immediate creation of a northern Aboriginal country food infrastructure in Canada to prevent northern Aboriginal food shortages and create a base for the northern economy. INAC did not act on the study’s recommendations and did not release the study’s findings to Aboriginal Peoples. The Government of Canada still refuses to facilitate the creation of an Aboriginal country food infrastructure. In 2010, a health study was published showing the availability of nutritious food in the North has reached crisis levels leaving up to 70% of preschool Inuit children in Nunavut without enough food to eat. The withholding of knowledge and funding by INAC and the current Conservative Government of Canada are the only discernable reasons for the current food crisis in Nunavut.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Hey Perry, let me know if your report ever becomes public. I am writing my second book on First Nations poverty which I hope to finish this summer and I am trying to include as much information about all this as possible. Thanks for the link. Some people think this is just conspiracy talk, but when I read the government documents, my eyes were opened for good. Pam

    ReplyDelete
  9. Ok Pam. I will keep you updated. My report is private at this time because I go into great detail about my own personal situation to illustrate systemic problems. The personal is political. But there is a possibility it will become public, at least in part, depending on the response I get and what further action I will feel compelled to take. I'm a few weeks away from finishing the draft, so it may take a month or more before I get any response.

    Something else you might be interested in. Last week I sent a letter by regular mail to the President of the CBC regarding anti-Aboriginal racism in the comment sections of the CBC website. Around the time the crisis in Attawapiskat blew up in the media, I noticed an increase in online racism related to that story. I began to submit comments under my real name in an attempt to point out and rebut that racism. However, many of my comments were censored, while anonymous racist comments were approved.

    I complained many times to the moderators, and then finally to the CBC Ombudsman, who passed on my complaint to the Moderator Manager. All my online complaints were ignored. So, I wrote directly to the President and board. I'll let you know what response I get and what subsequent action I'll take when I do.

    ReplyDelete